Intangic MGA Home

Category

Market Insight

5 articles

Three Ledgers, One Loss: Evidencing, Valuing and Reserving Intangible Claims in 2026

In physical damage claims, the adjuster's first site visit settles evidence, value and reserve almost simultaneously. Intangible losses break that sequence, and UK MGAs are discovering the cost of the gap. This article sets out the three linked problems and a practical checklist for claims teams handling reputational, contractual, data and key-person notifications.

Penalties in the Paperwork: Why UK MGAs Keep Misreading Contractual Intangibles as Physical Loss

Penalties in the Paperwork: Why UK MGAs Keep Misreading Contractual Intangibles as Physical Loss

Liquidated damages, performance penalties, service credits and termination payments are contractual numbers, not physical damage — yet they increasingly sit behind claims presented to UK MGAs as if they were tangible losses. This analysis examines why those exposures are missed in construction, engineering and professional lines, and how underwriters can identify and word around them before they reach dispute.

Where Delegated Authority Still Earns Its Keep: Five UK MGA Lines for a Tighter 2026

Where Delegated Authority Still Earns Its Keep: Five UK MGA Lines for a Tighter 2026

Tighter reinsurance appetite in 2026 is exposing the limits of broad commodity underwriting for UK MGAs. This opinion-led review argues that delegated authority is most defensible in five specialist lines where underwriting insight, evidence and scheme discipline can still create genuine value for brokers and capacity providers.